Content Policy and Selection

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement requirements:



Institute for Scientific Research and Development founded on 06.08.2012 in Ulcinj in accordance with Article 46 of the Law on Scientific – Research in the Republic of Montenegro (Official Journal of RCG ‘s no. 71/05) and Decision the Ministry of Science of the Republic of Montenegro, Nr. 01-239 / 4 dated. 22.04.2013 for award of license to quality private institution for performing basic activities (fundamental) research; development and implementation of research, issues this:


The Institute for Research and Development is the founder of three scientific journals;

  1. Publications of the International Scientific Journal “Monte” – In which are published the scientific works of various high quality scientific fields. The papers are published in English.
  2. Publications of the Multidisciplinary Research Journal ,,Olcinium,,– In which are published qualitative scientific papers of different scientific fields in different languages.
  3. Publications of the Scientific Bulletin of International Scientific Conferences – Proceedings of the Scientific Conference which is held every year, in the first week of April.
  4. Publications
  5. Books and monograph



Bodies of the Institute for Scientific Research and Development

  1. Leadership structure
  2. Governing structures

– Director

– Governing Council

– The Scientific Council

  1. Leadership

– Directorate for international cooperation

– Directorate for national programs

– Directorate for publishing activities

– Directorate for innovative and technological development

– Directorate for personnel and general work

– Department of activities for scientific research

– Directorate for general education and professional education

– Directorate for organizing scientific conferences

– Directorate for advancement and promotion of scientific journals

– Directorate for information and web design





Publishing activity

  1. Director of scientific journals
  2. Publisher’s editorial staff
  3. Editorial Board



Who We Are

International Scientific Journal “Monte” “MONTE” is an independent organization delivering supports and services to education and research studies. In partnership with universities, community organizations, public agencies, enterprises and other research institutes, International Scientific Journal “Monte” “ offers a variety of programs to support and promote social and education development, international cooperation, including educational programs for students and international education projects, as well as scientific publication and organization of international conferences. We have published a number of special editions with many universities in the World and also International Scientific Journal “Monte” has been partner in many international conferences organised by research centres and universities


Ethic Statement

The publication of an article in a peer reviewed journal is an essential model for International Scientific Journal “Monte” as one Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies.

It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher.

Our ethic statements are based on Committee on Publication Ethics, with Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Publication decisions

The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.

The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


Director of International Scientific Journal “Monte”

Prof.Dr. Elez Osmanovic CV


Prof.Dr.Alba Dumi (Albania)

Prof. Dr. Akhter Alam (India)

Prof. Dr. Sonja Vitanova (Macedonia)

Prof. Dr. Tibor Petres (Hungary)

Prof. Dr. Michael Minch (USA)

                Scientific Board

Acad.Prof.Dr. Slobodan Nešković, (Serbia)

                  Editor-In Chief

Prof.Dr.Diana Shehu – (Editor-In Chief)

           Language Editors

Prof.Dr.Jusuf Mustafaj

Edona Osmanoviq

Technical Editors

Dr.Emin Neziri

Mr.Besard Jakupi



Every submision paper will be analyses by two reviewers wich are profesional regarding too the topics of paper field with. The proces of review paper will be trough double blind process.



The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to (Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.



Author-ship of the Papers

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.


Refund Policy

In case of double payment we will refund the fee by Bank Transfer. In this case bank charges will be paid by both, journal and author. If you have paid through Paypal or if you have a Paypal account we will refund the money in your Paypal account to avoid the bank charges. In case of acceptance of the paper and when your paper is scheduled for publication no refund will be applied if authors withdraw the paper.